29.11.2013, 00:41 - bkr2n37ont - - 24 Posts
Lead: China there are two things to be clear: First, the need for government commitment is now doing enough. Government should acquire a life insurance money, such as subsistence allowances, relief is the governments responsibility, not push; another converse sale on the one hand, the government should do flexible, mobile, especially doing social service,uggs online, which is non-governmental organizations can do. Economic Observer newspaper reporter Xie Liang nike free run Bing Shen Lim Cho Li Haojie sun, WangZhenYao frowning but smiling. The former Ministry of Civil Affairs Social Welfare and Charity Promotion Division Director, is now dean of Beijing Normal University charity. High retreat, why start painstaking research mbt shoes? WangZhenYao explained that this is because in the public service industry chain, for public research is quite weak. In WangZhenYao opinion, and like many industries, there is no "research" this support forces charity sector is difficult to go far. In doing research before WangZhenYao the Ministry of Civil Affairs has "practice" for over 20 years. During this period, he facilitated the completion of a minimum living security, medical assistance, and many other Security System, and promote the establishment of social welfare and charity department. It is precisely because there are more than 20 years in the practice of charity within the system, so WangZhenYao become the most qualified charitable speakers. He has a charitable dictionary words - "the poor." Since 1997, because of the working relationship, WangZhenYao began to rescue the poor. In his own words, this lifetime in dealing with the poor. WangZhenYao is an optimist. 2008 Wenchuan earthquake allowed him to "80" after the view has changed. In the disaster area, he witnessed the act and responsibility of this group. Meanwhile, he also not in favor of "the whole social and moral turpitude" point of view, he always believed that China is the goodness of the human heart, but Nanjing judges decision brings much negative impact. WangZhenYao also an idealist. He believes that Chinas reform has reached a stage. Mentioned in the partys 18 social reform, the reform and economic reform is not the same, which he called "happiness reform." "Who is not deprivation, but the increase of various social welfare, we need to adjust a lot of ideas and policies. "He said. China did not save poor habits Economic Observer: in 2001, one year after returning home from Harvard, you served as District Secretary, Ministry of Disaster Relief, began to promote the urban minimum living security system is established, why would you choose such a starting point? WangZhenYao: At SOE reform, laid-off workers up to 3000 people. In 2001, the situation is more urgent, reemployed person without a source of livelihood. August survey in Guizhou, when the central government to increase 1.5 billion yuan from the central budget to the Ministry of Finance to implement it, to solve this problem. The original central government is not to take money, so where do it. The results are given in local government civil affairs object three elderly, have no effect on the re-employment of laid-off. September we held a national emergency meeting, requiring October guaranteeing the need to incorporate the reemployment list done, in November put 1.5 billion yuan central budget allocated down. Soon, national civil system began to implement this thing, one month after the national guaranteeing that the number reached more than 1,200 people. June 30 the following year, the National Yingbaojinbao, guaranteeing that the number reached 23 million at once, urban problems basically stable. Economic Observer: low because of the rapid increase in the number of minimum standards change,uggs sale? WangZhenYao: not standard changes, mainly the central money achieved universal. Cultural traditions of our country has always been not a panacea for poverty, for thousands of years is not a panacea for poverty habits. Premier Zhu Rongji when he was so obviously see the effect, indicating that the budget be doubled, then reached 4.6 billion yuan, 4.6 billion yuan does not work then I said to double again in 2003, reaching 10 billion yuan new balance, the actual re-doubled was 92 billion. Then we began to do the rural subsistence allowances, then Central do not agree with, some say it needs to be done in rural areas? They have the earth. In the Ministry of Civil Affairs of the "Statistical Yearbook", there is a period of "rural poor households," the aid system, and that is my idea, we said we did get low, the line does not get rural poor households. Chinas subsistence allowances system so established. government Receding Economic Observer: You mentioned during his tenure at the Ministry of Civil Affairs have done these things, in abroad is not much by social organizations bear? WangZhenYao: China there are two things to be clear: First, the need for government commitment is now doing enough. I push these systems is precisely the government should take the government should acquire a life insurance money, such as subsistence allowances, relief is the governments responsibility, not push; On the other hand, the government should do flexible, mobile, social services, especially to do This is civil society organizations can do. Governments need to support civil society organizations, philanthropy, and civil society in order to converge. If the government does not intensify support to civil society organizations grow. In fact, in 2005, after three years, we have come to realize that civil society organizations should be based, government cooperation. What the government needs to do is put the money out to encourage civil society organizations to do pension, charity, orphans and other things. Economic Observer: in 2005 the government has been aware of this, but for Chinas development in terms of social organization, in 2008 the real turning point. WangZhenYao: Yes, which I experience deep. Because before the disaster, when civil society organizations is very difficult to want to come in, can contact range is relatively small, did not enter the room and experience. Such as ice storms in early 2008, the South, when the Narada Foundation, vice chairman and secretary general Xu Yongguang said CSOs action slow. However, to the earthquake, these civil society organizations on the whole look out. Because disaster area is too large, very heavy hit almost 30,000 square kilometers, the population shifted out almost more than ten million, there is no civil society action can not. Economic Observer: Why is there such a big change civil society organizations? WangZhenYao: I think it was three forces: first, the Chinese people have good elements. Chinese people generally Bong fanli as Treasurer, acknowledged he was a great philanthropist, three loose their money, that the Chinese people have good roots; Second, Chinas economic development to this step. 2008 Chinas per capita GDP exceeded 3,000 U.S. dollars, there is a certain force to charity; Third, in 2005 the central policy has changed dramatically. Do all kinds of charity leaders continue to promote the central organs donation no differences on the issue. Historical heritage, economic fundamentals and policy adjustments, making the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, civil society organizations there is a major change. Economic Observer: Does this mean that the future will be the rise of Chinese power of charity-based civil society organizations? WangZhenYao: I think the civil power will rise, charity has always been private. But the rise of the links may not the same as we had imagined. From the money point of view, there will be several hundred billion dollars annually output; from providing employment, the future charity industry will have more than 34 million jobs. In other countries, charitable sector employment accounts for about 10% of the employed population. Charity is an important force in Chinas future stability. Future of philanthropy should be led by the private sector, government support, this model would be a mainstream. From 2008 to the present is a major turning point, governments are increasingly stepped back policies are increasingly moving forward. For example this year there are two major turning points to note: First, open the registration of charities, the charitable organization a lot of pressure, mainly from internal; another is involved in charity folk who more and more, these people including retired officials, as well as incumbent officials ladies. The so-called Lao San Jie, the new third began to return to society, which means that Chinas non-governmental organizations will be more powerful. charitable credibility on the rise Economic Observer: civil society organizations such development, whether and in recent years to some of the government-run or semi-official background charity organizations such as Mei-US events which led to decline in the credibility of information? How to resolve the current crisis in emerging public charitable organization? WangZhenYao: I feel like nike blazer mixed with others. I think, the credibility of charitable organizations all these years on the rise. "Mei-US events" But is everyones emotional catharsis, We accept these questions are not suited to the modern charity when, really have very few problems. In comparison, in June this year, the United States revealed a dozen charities donated billions of dollars into the personal pockets of the majority, to donors spend only 5% of the object, which caused an uproar in the United States. China has such a thing? May have, but rarely. Chinese are exposed opaque procedures are not legal. So, I think the longer, the more we will understand that China is now the main problem is not charity scandal, the main problem is not yet open, is too tight, standards are too stringent, just as the same as the market economy has just released this period of questioning and struggle, and not be exposed to the credibility of the charitable sector in decline. But in the question, everyone is more self-discipline. Economic Observer: mbt shoes like the Red Cross or charity organizations such as government-run future should be how to develop,hogan scarpe? WangZhenYao: the future we should give full play to trade union and government public relations advantage, do some larger projects. I have always felt that the Red can ill children first thing to do it, they have to fight to the tens of millions of government financial support, not only from a social fund-raising, can get more from the government funds. Economic Observer: You mean, the Red Cross does not require these organizations out of its official background or say "to the Chief"? WangZhenYao: the world are like the Red Cross, which has some official capacity, have this advantage. Charitable sector has an ecological chain, some organizations and is a close relationship between the Crown, such as the Red Cross, including the United States, Canada, are like this. China just let them have a quasi-civil servants, but compared to other countries to support smaller. Speaking of the Red Cross reform, "to the Chief" little narrow face, a kind of negative meaning in it. I think it should be called "social" reforms are more appropriate. "Socialization" richer initiative, that is, and public contact. Nothing official nature, to have government support and resources are not a bad thing, the key is to figure out "what" questions. Industry ecosystem need to constantly enrich and strengthen. Some organizations may not be professional, lack of expertise within the system is to support the system has some problems. No need to say diametrically opposed the government and the private sector, government procurement of public services after such limits will become increasingly weaker. Government would become the birthplace of charity, the Government will support the force, rather than leading.
|