| ?9v5?? |
| Feldwebel |
 |
 |
| 55 Posts |
| registered: 03.12.2013 |
|
's attorney said that after the "loan contract is signed,doudoune moncler, the bank according to the contract on the same day at noon to the ??? into account loans 30,000 yuan. Due to Bank staff operational errors, and in the day afternoon to repeat the ??? account into 30,000 yuan loans that into a total of 60,000 yuan. "Later, when reconciled to the bank found errors, repeatedly found Yu Yonggang, hoping that he would return $ 30,000. But he did not receive support ??? 30,parajumpers,000 yuan loans banks give,218.7.19.253/home.php?mod=space&uid=634421, but did not withdraw the money too. Yu Yonggang loan until the expiration of the contract, the dispute can not be resolved. July 2010, the bank will sue to Yu Yonggang Shihezi City People's Court, until the court can, Yu Yonggang did not show up. The first instance,news.instyle.com/2013/07/03/beach-cover-ups/#comment-8395933, the bank loan contract submitted to the court, the borrower certificates and credentials Yu Yonggang withdrawals,nfl jerseys, account statements. The court found that: In ??? account of the bill,vbacfacts.com/13-myths-about-vbac/comment-page-1/#comment-282080, at 13:20 on May 26,hollister outlet,boards.dcoweb.org/query/index.cgi, 2009 and 20:14 play money 30,000 yuan respectively. In the same year on July 12,hogan outlet, Yu Yonggang play money in the accounts of 5,000 yuan, accounts totaling more than 65,000 yuan money. And during the loan contract, the ??? account withdrawals totaling 63,500 yuan. Yu Yonggang did not appear in court due to the first-instance court default judgment: Yu Yonggang return of 30,000 yuan bank loan and pay interest 703.24 yuan. After the court ruling, Yu Yonggang finally exposed surface. But he refused to accept the verdict, in November 2010 appealed to Nong Bashi Intermediate People's Court. Court,mulberry sale, the two sides had a heated debate. Banks face of the evidence presented, Yu Yonggang insisted: "I did not see the 30,igamex.clanteam.com/index.php?file=Guestbook,hollister sale,000 yuan loans outside nor the money to take over the bank unilaterally, without my signature on the bill, does not prove that I caught this. money. "Yu Yonggang dedicated submitted during the lending bank card and verify that the card had been kept by him, and never lend it to others,air jordan pas cher, and only he knows the password. Banks require Yu Yonggang provide matching with the bank passbook card to print transactions for this account, but ??? called "passbook has been lost." Nong Bashi Intermediate People's Court immediately to the bank,mulberry sale, the credit card submitted by ??? retrieved the transaction list for this card. After checking,dfpic.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=4859380, the contents of the bill submitted by the bank and the first instance of the same. The court found: Bank lending to more than 30,hollister online shop,000 yuan Yu Yonggang fact exist. Yu Yonggang should get 30,000 yuan more than the return of their loans to the bank. Recently, Nong Bashi Intermediate People's Court made the final decision: dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict. Nong Bashi Intermediate People's Court judge saying Lee Judge: Focus on the present case is whether the parties to the dispute to the bank account ??? multi-hit 30,000 yuan loans. Most withdrawals were due ??? on ATMs is completed, the bank teller can not provide credentials contain Yu Yonggang signature objectively. However,hollister,mkblackfriday2013.com/high-quality-michael-kors-cyber-monday-leather-bags/#comment-22983, a breakdown of bank loans during the retrieval of ??? is the bank's computer system automatically operation is completed, a clear reflection of the date of the loan into two 30,000 yuan Yu Yonggang account the fact that the contents of the court described the breakdown of custody on their own with ???consistent with the contents of bank card transactions and obtained. Therefore,doudoune moncler pas cher, the bank can be identified to Yu Yonggang extra 3 million in loans. According to China's "Civil Law" states: "There is no lawful basis to obtain improper benefits, causing losses to others,www.wingaroo.com/blog/index.php?option=com_blog&view=comments&pid=79&Itemid=0, illegal profits shall be returned to the people affected by the loss." Therefore, Yu Yonggang 30,000 yuan loans should get back to its multi- Bank.
|
